Is my relationship one-sided?
Short answer: One-sidedness is measurable, not just a feeling. Your message history already contains the four numbers that settle the question: who initiates, who repairs, who plans, and who asks.
The four signals
- Initiation. Who starts conversations? A stable 70/30 split over months is a structural fact about the relationship, not a coincidence.
- Repair. After friction, who moves first — apologises, softens, re-opens? Chronic one-sided repair is the strongest predictor of resentment.
- Planning. Who converts “we should” into a time and a place? Practical effort is harder to fake than affection.
- Curiosity. Who asks questions about the other's life and follows up on the answers? Curiosity is cheap, so its absence is informative.
What one-sidedness is not
It is not different expressiveness. Some people write less and show up more; some write beautifully and never appear. Judge the ledger over months, weighting actions over adjectives, and exclude unusual periods — a bereavement or a crunch at work distorts a short sample.
Before you conclude
Check whether you have made asking possible. Hinting is not asking. Many long imbalances survive because the person carrying the relationship never states a specific need, and the other assumes the arrangement is fine. One clear sentence — “I'd like you to be the one who plans something next time” — turns a private tally into a testable request.
If it stays one-sided after you ask
A request that is heard changes behaviour within a few weeks, even imperfectly. A request that is agreed to and then absorbed into the old pattern has told you what the relationship is willing to be. At that point the decision is about what you accept, not about what they meant.
Where Subtext fits
Subtext analyses your actual chat export and returns the ledger: initiation balance, response patterns, who repairs after conflict, and how the dynamic changed over time — evidence rather than the story you replay.
Read the message with Subtext